<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone &#8211; To unlock or not to unlock?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetechbrief.com/2007/10/02/iphone-%e2%80%93-to-unlock-or-not-to-unlock/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetechbrief.com/2007/10/02/iphone-%e2%80%93-to-unlock-or-not-to-unlock/</link>
	<description>Technology news for busy people.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: iPhones are so yesterday&#8217;s news.</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechbrief.com/2007/10/02/iphone-%e2%80%93-to-unlock-or-not-to-unlock/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>iPhones are so yesterday&#8217;s news.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechbrief.com/2007/10/02/iphone-%e2%80%93-to-unlock-or-not-to-unlock/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>[...] wireless has just unleashed it’s first attempt at an iPhone killer. Possibly the most interesting model in their new range is the LG Electronics’ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] wireless has just unleashed it’s first attempt at an iPhone killer. Possibly the most interesting model in their new range is the LG Electronics’ [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Knowles &#187; iPhone – To unlock or not to unlock?</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechbrief.com/2007/10/02/iphone-%e2%80%93-to-unlock-or-not-to-unlock/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Knowles &#187; iPhone – To unlock or not to unlock?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 21:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechbrief.com/2007/10/02/iphone-%e2%80%93-to-unlock-or-not-to-unlock/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>[...] Published here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Published here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Knowles</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechbrief.com/2007/10/02/iphone-%e2%80%93-to-unlock-or-not-to-unlock/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Knowles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 07:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechbrief.com/2007/10/02/iphone-%e2%80%93-to-unlock-or-not-to-unlock/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Thanks. Personally, I think this was all planned ahead. Look at the free marketing and mileage they are getting from this. I love Apple products, but this business of controlling every penny is making them appear greedy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. Personally, I think this was all planned ahead. Look at the free marketing and mileage they are getting from this. I love Apple products, but this business of controlling every penny is making them appear greedy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheGrizz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechbrief.com/2007/10/02/iphone-%e2%80%93-to-unlock-or-not-to-unlock/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>TheGrizz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechbrief.com/2007/10/02/iphone-%e2%80%93-to-unlock-or-not-to-unlock/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I have wondered the same thing about Apple and its marketing decisions on more than one occasion.  I think Apple needs to let go of the control just a little, they make good products but I tend not to want to use them because they are so exclusive.  Good discussion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have wondered the same thing about Apple and its marketing decisions on more than one occasion.  I think Apple needs to let go of the control just a little, they make good products but I tend not to want to use them because they are so exclusive.  Good discussion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.768 seconds -->
