<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPod touch – wait for 2.0?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetechbrief.com/2007/11/02/ipod-touch-%e2%80%93-wait-for-20/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetechbrief.com/2007/11/02/ipod-touch-%e2%80%93-wait-for-20/</link>
	<description>Technology news for busy people.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechbrief.com/2007/11/02/ipod-touch-%e2%80%93-wait-for-20/#comment-3105</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechbrief.com/2007/11/02/ipod-touch-%e2%80%93-wait-for-20/#comment-3105</guid>
		<description>The iPod Touch you buy Today will be upgradeable to the 2.0 through firmware updates.
So if you wait you'll just be prolonging your iNirvana... :O)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The iPod Touch you buy Today will be upgradeable to the 2.0 through firmware updates.<br />
So if you wait you&#8217;ll just be prolonging your iNirvana&#8230; :O)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jovan</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechbrief.com/2007/11/02/ipod-touch-%e2%80%93-wait-for-20/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Jovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechbrief.com/2007/11/02/ipod-touch-%e2%80%93-wait-for-20/#comment-347</guid>
		<description>If I didn't have an iPhone, I would def. have one of these. They are great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I didn&#8217;t have an iPhone, I would def. have one of these. They are great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.340 seconds -->
